White v. Experian Consumer Fraud Assistance

Fourth Circuit

White v. Experian Consumer Fraud Assistance

671 F. App'x 878

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 21, 2016·No. No. 16-7158·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth White appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint for [879] failure to state a claim and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. White v. Experian Consumer Fraud, No. 1:16-cv-00049-JPB-MJA (N.D. W. Va. Aug. 15, 2016). We also deny White’s motion for default judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth White appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint for [879] failure to state a claim and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. White v. Experian Consumer Fraud, No. 1:16-cv-00049-JPB-MJA (N.D. W. Va. Aug. 15, 2016). We also deny White’s motion for default judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

White v. Experian Consumer Fraud Assistance, 671 F. App'x 878 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

671 F. App'x 878 (White v. Experian Consumer Fraud Assistance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related