White v. Experian Consumer Fraud Assistance
This text of 671 F. App'x 878 (White v. Experian Consumer Fraud Assistance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Kenneth White appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint for [879]*879failure to state a claim and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. White v. Experian Consumer Fraud, No. 1:16-cv-00049-JPB-MJA (N.D. W. Va. Aug. 15, 2016). We also deny White’s motion for default judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
671 F. App'x 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-experian-consumer-fraud-assistance-ca4-2016.