White v. Erdos
This text of White v. Erdos (White v. Erdos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jermeal White,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 1:19cv1009
Warden R. Erdos, et al., Judge Michael R. Barrett
Defendants.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed by the Magistrate Judge on January 29, 2020 (Doc. 8). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s R&R (Doc. 8) have been filed. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 8) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, the Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1), with the exception of plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claim against defendant Stringer in his individual capacity. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett, Judge United States District Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
White v. Erdos, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-erdos-ohsd-2020.