White v. Dwinel

33 Me. 320
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1851·Published

Opinion

Wells, J., orally. —

An office copy is not evidence that a paper, of which it is a transcript, was a genuine paper.

The demandants claim by inheritance from the grantee in the supposed deed. The rule of the Court, allowing office copies, touching the realty, does not authorize the use of a copy by the heirs of a grantee.

There is then no competent evidence that a deed from Daniel Webster to James Webster ever had an existence.

Nonsuit confirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. Dwinel, 33 Me. 320 (Me. 1851).

33 Me. 320 (White v. Dwinel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.