White v. Department of Justice

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in White v. Department of Justice. Read the opinion of the Court — 952 F. Supp. 2d 213
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided September 27, 2012·No. Civil Action No. 2011-2045·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ANTHONY G. WHITE, SR., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-2045 (RJL) ) DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ) ) Defendant. )

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is this~ day of September 2012,

ORDERED that defendant's motion to dismiss or for summary judgment [Dkt. #

11] is DENIED without prejudice; it is further

ORDERED that by October 30, 2012, defendant shall supplement the record

with evidence that adequately explains its search for responsive records and the FOIA

exemptions it invoked to withhold responsive records, and renew its motion for summary

judgment. Plaintiff shall have until December 5, 2012, to file his response to defendant's

renewed motion.

SO ORDERED. I

~ United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. Department of Justice, (D.D.C. 2012).

White v. Department of Justice (White v. Department of Justice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.