White v. Dennis P.

Court of Appeals of Texas

White v. Dennis P.

139 S.W.3d 465, 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 6444, 2004 WL 1615923

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 20, 2004·No. 05-04-00223-CV·Published

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Appellant did not file her brief by the due date of May 29, 2004. By letter dated June 9, 2004, the Court informed appellant that her brief was overdue and directed appellant to file her brief and a motion for extension of time to file the brief within ten days of the date of the letter. The letter warned appellant that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the appeal. To date, appellant has not filed her brief. Accordingly, the Court DIS-

*466 MISSES appellant’s appeal for want of prosecution. Tex.R.App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Appellant did not file her brief by the due date of May 29, 2004. By letter dated June 9, 2004, the Court informed appellant that her brief was overdue and directed appellant to file her brief and a motion for extension of time to file the brief within ten days of the date of the letter. The letter warned appellant that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the appeal. To date, appellant has not filed her brief. Accordingly, the Court DIS-

*466 MISSES appellant’s appeal for want of prosecution. Tex.R.App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

White v. Dennis P., 139 S.W.3d 465, 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 6444, 2004 WL 1615923 (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

139 S.W.3d 465 (White v. Dennis P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.