White v. Day

Ho-Chunk Nation Supreme Court

White v. Day

11 Am. Tribal Law 376

Ho-Chunk Nation Supreme Court·Decided September 25, 2009·No. No. SU 09-06·Published

Opinion

ORDER DENYING APPEAL

This matter came before the full Court by telephone conference on Tuesday, Sep tember 22, 2009. The Order that is being appealed is dated as filed on July 7, 2009. Pursuant to the HCN Rules of Appellate Procedure, appeals must be perfected within sixty (60) days of the order or judg ment being appealed. This appeal was not filed in a timely manner. In addition, there was no legal basis for an appeal. [377] HCN Rules of Appellate Procedure, Rule 10 B was not followed. Therefore, the appeal request must be denied.

This Court hereby ORDERS:

1. That the Notice of Appeal is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED. EGI HES-KEKJET.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER DENYING APPEAL

This matter came before the full Court by telephone conference on Tuesday, Sep tember 22, 2009. The Order that is being appealed is dated as filed on July 7, 2009. Pursuant to the HCN Rules of Appellate Procedure, appeals must be perfected within sixty (60) days of the order or judg ment being appealed. This appeal was not filed in a timely manner. In addition, there was no legal basis for an appeal. [377] HCN Rules of Appellate Procedure, Rule 10 B was not followed. Therefore, the appeal request must be denied.

This Court hereby ORDERS:

1. That the Notice of Appeal is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED. EGI HES-KEKJET.

White v. Day, 11 Am. Tribal Law 376 (hochunk 2009).

Pincite

11 Am. Tribal Law 376 (White v. Day) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.