White v. Danville City Jail
Opinion
Tomica LaVerne White appeals the district court’s order dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See White v. Danville City Jail, No. 7:06-cv00662-jct, 2007 WL 128323 (W.D.Va. filed January 9, 2007; entered January 10, 2007). We also deny White’s motion for appointment of counsel. [277]*277We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
223 F. App'x 276 (White v. Danville City Jail) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.