White v. Dakin

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

White v. Dakin

47 A. 611, 70 N.H. 632

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedJune 5, 1900

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 47 A. 611 (White v. Dakin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White v. Dakin, 47 A. 611, 70 N.H. 632 (N.H. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Peaslee, J.

There was no evidence to justify a finding of fraud. Such a conclusión would have been mere conjecture. Deschenes v. Railroad, 69 N. H. 285, 288, et seq.

*633 The testimony of the creditor was properly excluded. Although not a party of record, he was directly interested in the result of the appeal. Foster v. Ela, 69 N. H. 460.

FJxceptions overruled.

Young, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peaslee, J.

There was no evidence to justify a finding of fraud. Such a conclusión would have been mere conjecture. Deschenes v. Railroad, 69 N. H. 285, 288, et seq.

*633 The testimony of the creditor was properly excluded. Although not a party of record, he was directly interested in the result of the appeal. Foster v. Ela, 69 N. H. 460.

FJxceptions overruled.

Young, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 A. 611, 70 N.H. 632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-dakin-nh-1900.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack