White v. CRIME PREVENTION SECURITY SPECIALISTS
713 N.W.2d 778, 475 Mich. 875
Opinion
Evelyn WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CRIME PREVENTION SECURITY SPECIALISTS and Accident Fund Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 3, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., would remand this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
White v. CRIME PREVENTION SECURITY SPECIALISTS, 713 N.W.2d 778, 475 Mich. 875 (Mich. 2006).
713 N.W.2d 778 (White v. CRIME PREVENTION SECURITY SPECIALISTS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.