Home/Michigan Supreme Court/White v. CRIME PREVENTION SECURITY SPECIALISTS

White v. CRIME PREVENTION SECURITY SPECIALISTS

713 N.W.2d 778, 475 Mich. 875
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedMay 31, 2006
Docket130414
StatusPublished

This text of 713 N.W.2d 778 (White v. CRIME PREVENTION SECURITY SPECIALISTS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
White v. CRIME PREVENTION SECURITY SPECIALISTS, 713 N.W.2d 778, 475 Mich. 875 (Mich. 2006).

Opinion

713 N.W.2d 778 (2006)
475 Mich. 875

Evelyn WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CRIME PREVENTION SECURITY SPECIALISTS and Accident Fund Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees.

Docket No. 130414. COA No. 264622.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

May 31, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 3, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., would remand this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted.

MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
713 N.W.2d 778, 475 Mich. 875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-crime-prevention-security-specialists-mich-2006.