White v. Corporation of Yazoo City

27 Miss. 357
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1854
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 27 Miss. 357 (White v. Corporation of Yazoo City) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
White v. Corporation of Yazoo City, 27 Miss. 357 (Mich. 1854).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Handy

delivered the opinion of the court.

The only question presented by this record is, whether the defendant is liable to an action for consequential damage resulting to the property of the plaintiffs in error from a ditch, or culvert, made on the side of a public street in Yazoo City by the. defendants.

[359]*359The charter of the town gave the corporate authorities “ power to cause to be opened, graded, and repaired, or otherwise improved, any street, lane, alley, sewers, gutters,” &c.

The power to do the work is thus amply conferred. It was not alleged that it was wantonly and unnecessarily exercised by the corporate authorities in making the improvement; but it was simply proposed to prove that great damage had been sustained by the plaintiffs to their property in consequence of the work. This gave no right of action; for although an injury was occasioned to the plaintiffs by the work, it was done for the public good and under competent authority; and the principle applicable to such cases is, that the general good must prevail over partial individual inconvenience. Lauring v. Smith, 8 Cowen, 149; Wilson v. Mayor of New York, 1 Denio.

The evidence was, therefore, properly rejected, and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. Meridian Light & Ry. Co.
69 So. 596 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1915)
Slaughter v. Meridian Light & Railway Co.
48 So. 6 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1909)
King v. Vicksburg Railway & Light Co.
42 So. 204 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1906)
Cunningham v. City of Seattle
84 P. 641 (Washington Supreme Court, 1906)
Henderson v. City of Minneapolis
20 N.W. 322 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1884)
Gould v. City of Topeka
32 Kan. 485 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1884)
Smith v. City Council of Alexandria
74 Va. 208 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1880)
City of Detroit v. Beckman
34 Mich. 125 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1876)
City of Pontiac v. Carter
32 Mich. 164 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1875)
Eaton v. B. C. & M. R. R.
51 N.H. 504 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1872)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 Miss. 357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-corporation-of-yazoo-city-miss-1854.