White v. Cooper

Fourth Circuit

White v. Cooper

470 F. App'x 142

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 3, 2012

DocketNo. 12-1157

StatusPublished

This text of 470 F. App'x 142 (White v. Cooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White v. Cooper, 470 F. App'x 142 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this action alleging employment discrimination, Linda White appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment in' favor of the defendant. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. White v. Cooper, No. 2:10-cv-00536-RMG, 2012 WL 137875 (D.S.C. Jan. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

In this action alleging employment discrimination, Linda White appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment in' favor of the defendant. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. White v. Cooper, No. 2:10-cv-00536-RMG, 2012 WL 137875 (D.S.C. Jan. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

470 F. App'x 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-cooper-ca4-2012.