White v. CONESTOGA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
994 A.2d 1083, 606 Pa. 50, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1092
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 19, 2010
Docket761 EAL 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 994 A.2d 1083 (White v. CONESTOGA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
White v. CONESTOGA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, 994 A.2d 1083, 606 Pa. 50, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1092 (Pa. 2010).
Opinion
*51 ORDER
AND NOW, this 19th day of May 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
In reversing the Common Pleas Court’s dismissal of this action for lack of jurisdiction by reason of the administrative remedy provided by the TICA at 40 P.S. § 910 — 44(b), did the Superior Court err by holding that the statutory and decisional rule that adequate administrative remedies are exclusive does not apply to consumer class actions?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
White v. Conestoga Title Insurance
53 A.3d 720 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2012)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
994 A.2d 1083, 606 Pa. 50, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1092, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-conestoga-title-insurance-company-pa-2010.