White v. CONESTOGA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
994 A.2d 1083, 606 Pa. 50, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1092
Opinion
*51 ORDER
AND NOW, this 19th day of May 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
In reversing the Common Pleas Court’s dismissal of this action for lack of jurisdiction by reason of the administrative remedy provided by the TICA at 40 P.S. § 910 — 44(b), did the Superior Court err by holding that the statutory and decisional rule that adequate administrative remedies are exclusive does not apply to consumer class actions?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
White v. CONESTOGA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, 994 A.2d 1083, 606 Pa. 50, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1092 (Pa. 2010).
994 A.2d 1083 (White v. CONESTOGA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
White v. Conestoga Title Insurance
53 A.3d 720 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2012)