White v. Clarke

29 F. Cas. 1002, 5 D.C. 401, 5 Cranch 401

This text of 29 F. Cas. 1002 (White v. Clarke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
White v. Clarke, 29 F. Cas. 1002, 5 D.C. 401, 5 Cranch 401 (circtddc 1838).

Opinion

The Court

(Thruston, J.,

contra,) was of opinion that the defendants could not now supersede the decree.

Mr. Marbury then moved for an attachment; but the Court refused, and told him he might have a fieri facias, or ca. ca.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 F. Cas. 1002, 5 D.C. 401, 5 Cranch 401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-clarke-circtddc-1838.