White v. City of Pawhuska

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

White v. City of Pawhuska

1925 OK 737, 239 P. 578, 113 Okla. 270, 1925 Okla. LEXIS 981

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 15, 1925

Docket16338

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1925 OK 737 (White v. City of Pawhuska) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White v. City of Pawhuska, 1925 OK 737, 239 P. 578, 113 Okla. 270, 1925 Okla. LEXIS 981 (Okla. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This action was brought to enjoin the city of Pawhuska from letting *271 a certain paving contract, and a temporary restraining order was granted. On a hearing for a temporary injunction, the restraining cyder was dissolved, and a temporary injunction denied, and plaintiff in error appealed. A supersedeas bond was denied, and plaintiff in error made application. to this court for bond; it was also denied. After both the trial court and the Supreme Court had refused to supersede the judgment, defendant in erroy let the contract for the paving.

Since the enjoining of the letting of the contract was the only relief sought, and the contract having now been let, this appeal becomes moot, and is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This action was brought to enjoin the city of Pawhuska from letting *271 a certain paving contract, and a temporary restraining order was granted. On a hearing for a temporary injunction, the restraining cyder was dissolved, and a temporary injunction denied, and plaintiff in error appealed. A supersedeas bond was denied, and plaintiff in error made application. to this court for bond; it was also denied. After both the trial court and the Supreme Court had refused to supersede the judgment, defendant in erroy let the contract for the paving.

Since the enjoining of the letting of the contract was the only relief sought, and the contract having now been let, this appeal becomes moot, and is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1925 OK 737, 239 P. 578, 113 Okla. 270, 1925 Okla. LEXIS 981, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-city-of-pawhuska-okla-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack