White v. Chandler

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 22, 2002
Docket01-41008
StatusUnpublished

This text of White v. Chandler (White v. Chandler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
White v. Chandler, (5th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-41008 Conference Calendar

RANDY JOE WHITE,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

ERNEST V. CHANDLER,

Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:01-CV-325 -------------------- February 20, 2002

Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Randy Joe White, federal prisoner # 61041-180, appeals the

denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. He argues that his

sentence was improperly enhanced by his prior burglary conviction

under the Sentencing Guidelines because that conviction was not a

“crime of violence” within the meaning of the Armed Career

Criminals Act. White does not renew his challenge to his

sentence and indictment based on Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S.

466 (2000), and that claim is waived. See Yohey v. Collins, 985

F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993).

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-41008 -2-

White’s challenge to the calculation of his sentence under

the guidelines is a nonconstitutional one which could have been

raised on direct appeal and thus could not have been considered

in a § 2255 motion. See United States v. O’Keefe, 169 F.3d 281,

289 (5th Cir. 1999); United States v. Towe, 26 F.3d 614, 616 (5th

Cir. 1994). Because he could not raise it a § 2255 motion, a

fortiori, White is precluded from raising the claim in this

§ 2241 petition. The district court’s dismissal of the petition

is therefore AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
White v. Chandler, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-chandler-ca5-2002.