White v. Chalmers

Supreme Court of Florida

White v. Chalmers

190 So. 2d 574, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3308

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedOctober 5, 1966

DocketNo. 35403

StatusPublished

This text of 190 So. 2d 574 (White v. Chalmers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White v. Chalmers, 190 So. 2d 574, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3308 (Fla. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date of March 22, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that [575]*575there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorneys’ fees of the petitioner, Paul White, is also denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ-, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI