White v. Capital One

District Court, E.D. California·Decided June 18, 2025·No. 1:24-cv-00633·Unknown

Opinion

ELIZABETH RHODES, SBN 218480 elizabeth.rhodes@ogletree.com ERIC F. DELLA SANTA, SBN: 310458 eric.dellasanta@ogletree.com SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2800 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: 916-840-3150 Facsimile: 916-840-3159 Attorneys for CAPITAL ONE, N.A., and MARY DICKINS (erroneously sued as MARY DICKSON) KELSEY A. WEBBER, SBN 303721 kelsey.webber@webberlawgroup.com DOUGLAS M. EGBERT, SBN 265062 douglas.egbert@webberlawgroup.com SHAELYN A. STEWART, SBN 335149 shaelyn.stewart@webberlawgroup.com NATHAN A. SEARCY, SBN 345658 nathan.searcy@webberlawgroup.com WEBBER & EGBERT EMPLOYMENT 1610 R Street, Suite 300 Sacramento, CA 95811 Telephone: 916-588-0683 Attorneys for Plaintiff DOLORES WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DOLORES WHITE, Case No. 1:24-cv-00633-SKO Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER vs. (Doc. 45) CAPITAL ONE, National Association; MARY DICKSON, an individual; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants.

Plaintiff DOLORES WHITE (“Plaintiff”), and Defendants CAPITAL ONE, National Association (“Capital One”) and MARY DICKINS (“Dickins”) (collectively, “Defendants”), in the above-captioned action (the “Action”) hereby stipulate to the entry of the following protective order: 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Disclosure and discovery activity in the Action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting and defending the Action may be warranted. Accordingly, the Plaintiff and Defendants (each a “Party,” and together, the “Parties”) hereby stipulate to, and request that the Court enter, the following Stipulated Protective Order (the “Order”). The parties acknowledge that this Stipulation and Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords extends only the limited information or items that are entitled, under applicable legal principles, to treatment as confidential. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth below, that this Stipulation and Order creates no entitlement to file confidential information under seal; Eastern District Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and reflects the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. This Order is needed to protect the private information of Plaintiff (medical records, psychotherapeutic records, mental health records, financial records, and employment records) and the confidential information of Defendant (i.e. non-public financial, strategic, or commercial information or non-public personal information). This Order will ensure that the private and confidential information exchanged in discovery will not be shared publicly and will be adequately protected. The Parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under applicable law. 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party that challenges the designation of information or items under this Order. 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is generated, stored, or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under standards developed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) and/or applicable federal privileges. This material is Plaintiff’s medical records, psychotherapeutic records, mental health records, financial records, and employment records; as well as Defendants’ records containing non-public personal information (including information regarding Capital One’s employees and customers), internal messaging services used to convey and discuss non-public business practices, and internal business policies and practices; and other similar confidential records designated as such. 2.3 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and In-House Counsel (as well as their support staff). 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner in which they are generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in the Action. 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the Action who has been retained by a Party or its Counsel to serve as an expert witness or consultant in the Action. 2.7 In-House Counsel: litigation attorneys who are employees of a Party to this action. In-House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 2.8 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party in this Action. 2.9 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a Party to this action but are retained to represent or advise a Party to the Action and have appeared in the Action on behalf of that Party or are affiliated with or contracted by a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that Party. 2.10 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, and employees. 2.11 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this Action. 2.12 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 2.13 Privacy Information: any documents containing an individual's social security number or taxpayer identification number (other than only the last four digits thereof), an individual's birth date (other than only the year of the individual's birth), the name of an individual known to be a minor (other than only the minor's initials), a financial account number (other than only the last four digits thereof), "Personal Data," "Personally Identifiable Information," "Sensitive Private Data," or "Nonpublic Personal Information" as these terms are defined under federal, state or foreign data protection laws, including without limitation the General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (the "GDPR"), or any information that a party or non-party believes in good faith to be subject to non-US data protection laws, regardless of whether such information has been designated as "CONFIDENTIAL” (collectively “Privacy Information”). 2.14 Protected Material: (a) any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as “CONFIDENTIAL”; (b) any information that a party believes in good faith to be subject to federal, state, or foreign Data Protection Laws or other privacy obligations. Protected Material constitutes highly sensitive materials requiring special protection, including, but not limited to, The Gramm- Leach-Bliley Act, 15 U.S.C. § 6801 et seq. (financial information); The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and the regulations thereunder (HIPAA), 45 CFR Part 160 and Subparts A and E of Part 164 (medical information); Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), 15 USC § 1681 et seq. communication); Genetic Information Non-discrimination Act of 2008 (GINA) (biometric information); and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White v. Capital One, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

White v. Capital One (White v. Capital One) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Valley Bank of Nevada v. Superior Court
542 P.2d 977 (California Supreme Court, 1975)
Britt v. Superior Court
574 P.2d 766 (California Supreme Court, 1978)
Board of Trustees v. Superior Court
119 Cal. App. 3d 516 (California Court of Appeal, 1981)
Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. Superior Court
7 Cal. App. 4th 1384 (California Court of Appeal, 1992)
County of Placer v. Andrade
55 Cal. App. 4th 1393 (California Court of Appeal, 1997)
Williams v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.
398 P.3d 69 (California Supreme Court, 2017)