White v. Callinan

19 Ind. 43
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1862
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 19 Ind. 43 (White v. Callinan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
White v. Callinan, 19 Ind. 43 (Ind. 1862).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This was a suit by Callinan against White, [44]*44upon, a promissory note, payable to Wkeelan $ Co., and by them indorsed in blank to Miss Gilligan. She subsequently married Callinan, and delivered the note, thus indorsed, to him as his property, as, in short, a gift, and does not set up any further claim to it.

Daniel Mace, for the appellant. George Gardner, for the appellee.

White, the maker of the note, now answers to Callinan’s suit upon it, that it is not his, but his wife’s property. Callinan takes issue of fact upon the answer, and the above facts appear in evidence on the trial of the issue. The Court held that the note was Callinan’s, and we affirm the judgment.

Affirmed, with five per cent, damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Hibbard
75 P. 737 (Utah Supreme Court, 1904)
Indianapolis & Madison Railroad v. Solomon
23 Ind. 534 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1864)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 Ind. 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-callinan-ind-1862.