White v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Georgia

White v. Brown

77 S.E. 105, 12 Ga. App. 275, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 538

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 11, 1913

Docket4302

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 77 S.E. 105 (White v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White v. Brown, 77 S.E. 105, 12 Ga. App. 275, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 538 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Russell, J.

1. This being a motion to set aside a judgment absolute, rendered in a proceeding to forfeit a criminal recognizance, and it appearing from the allegations- of the petition that scire facias was duly issued and served upon the movants, and that they failed to appear and show why the judgment absolute should not be granted, it was too • late to urge, as ground for setting aside the judgment, any reason which might have been urged before its rendition, unless the judgment was for some reason absolutely void.

2. A judgment absolute rendered in a proceeding to forfeit a criminal recognizance is void if the accusation or indictment upon which it was founded sets forth no offense. Where, therefore, in a motion to set aside such a judgment absolute, it is alleged that the accusation upon which it was founded is void on its face, the reasons why the accusation is void being set forth in detail in the motion, it is error to sustain a demurrer on the ground that the motion sets forth no reason why the judgment should be set aside.

3. The effect of the ruling now made is to leave open only the question whether or not the accusation upon which the judgment absolute was founded is void on its face. None of the other reasons alleged in the petition?to set aside the judgment are meritorious. Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell, J.

1. This being a motion to set aside a judgment absolute, rendered in a proceeding to forfeit a criminal recognizance, and it appearing from the allegations- of the petition that scire facias was duly issued and served upon the movants, and that they failed to appear and show why the judgment absolute should not be granted, it was too • late to urge, as ground for setting aside the judgment, any reason which might have been urged before its rendition, unless the judgment was for some reason absolutely void.

2. A judgment absolute rendered in a proceeding to forfeit a criminal recognizance is void if the accusation or indictment upon which it was founded sets forth no offense. Where, therefore, in a motion to set aside such a judgment absolute, it is alleged that the accusation upon which it was founded is void on its face, the reasons why the accusation is void being set forth in detail in the motion, it is error to sustain a demurrer on the ground that the motion sets forth no reason why the judgment should be set aside.

3. The effect of the ruling now made is to leave open only the question whether or not the accusation upon which the judgment absolute was founded is void on its face. None of the other reasons alleged in the petition?to set aside the judgment are meritorious. Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 S.E. 105, 12 Ga. App. 275, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-brown-gactapp-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack