White v. Bronx Lebanon Hospital Center

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

White v. Bronx Lebanon Hospital Center

240 A.D.2d 212, 658 N.Y.S.2d 288, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6180

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 10, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 240 A.D.2d 212 (White v. Bronx Lebanon Hospital Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White v. Bronx Lebanon Hospital Center, 240 A.D.2d 212, 658 N.Y.S.2d 288, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6180 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jerry Crispino, J.), entered October 16, 1996, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to quash the subpoena and notice to take deposition of a nonresident, nonparty witness, and denied defendants’ cross motion for an order directing the witness’s deposition, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

In seeking to take the deposition of a nonresident, nonparty witness nine months after the note of issue was filed, defendants have failed to demonstrate any unusual or unanticipated circumstance warranting deviation from the rule that disclosure proceedings may not be conducted after the filing of the note of issue (see, Price v Bloomingdale’s, 166 AD2d 151). Further, the subpoena served by defendants upon the out-of-State nonparty witness has no legal effect in New York (Coombs v Rowand, 39 AD2d 532, appeal dismissed 31 NY2d 853). We have considered defendants’ remaining claims and find them to be without merit. Concur—Wallach, J. P., Rubin, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jerry Crispino, J.), entered October 16, 1996, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to quash the subpoena and notice to take deposition of a nonresident, nonparty witness, and denied defendants’ cross motion for an order directing the witness’s deposition, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

In seeking to take the deposition of a nonresident, nonparty witness nine months after the note of issue was filed, defendants have failed to demonstrate any unusual or unanticipated circumstance warranting deviation from the rule that disclosure proceedings may not be conducted after the filing of the note of issue (see, Price v Bloomingdale’s, 166 AD2d 151). Further, the subpoena served by defendants upon the out-of-State nonparty witness has no legal effect in New York (Coombs v Rowand, 39 AD2d 532, appeal dismissed 31 NY2d 853). We have considered defendants’ remaining claims and find them to be without merit. Concur—Wallach, J. P., Rubin, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.D.2d 212, 658 N.Y.S.2d 288, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-bronx-lebanon-hospital-center-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack