White v. Boyce

Michigan Supreme Court

White v. Boyce

50 N.W. 303, 88 Mich. 353

DecidedNovember 13, 1891

StatusPublished

This text of 50 N.W. 303 (White v. Boyce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White v. Boyce, 50 N.W. 303, 88 Mich. 353 (Mich. 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

Long, J.

The facts in this case are substantially as [354]*354stated in White v. Boyce, ante, 349. Emery claims to have been injured by the same means that Cottonham, in that suit, claimed to have been injured. Boyce was personally served with the summons by which the suit was commenced in justice’s court,'appeared, and adjourned the suit, and, after judgment there, procured the writ of certiorari from this Court directed to the justice’s court.

The writ must be dismissed, under the ruling in the former case, but no costs will be awarded.

Morse and McGrath, JJ., concurred. Ohahplin, C. J., and Grant, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Long, J.

The facts in this case are substantially as [354]*354stated in White v. Boyce, ante, 349. Emery claims to have been injured by the same means that Cottonham, in that suit, claimed to have been injured. Boyce was personally served with the summons by which the suit was commenced in justice’s court,'appeared, and adjourned the suit, and, after judgment there, procured the writ of certiorari from this Court directed to the justice’s court.

The writ must be dismissed, under the ruling in the former case, but no costs will be awarded.

Morse and McGrath, JJ., concurred. Ohahplin, C. J., and Grant, J., did not sit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 N.W. 303, 88 Mich. 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-boyce-mich-1891.