White v. Benjamin

15 Misc. 26, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 912
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedDecember 15, 1895
StatusPublished

This text of 15 Misc. 26 (White v. Benjamin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
White v. Benjamin, 15 Misc. 26, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 912 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

To warrant a new trial in this case the-practice requires not only that the newly-discovered evidence he material, and that it has been discovered since the trial, but that the evidence'could not by the exercise of reasonable-diligence have been sooner discovered, and' that it is so decisive in character as to make it appear with reasonable, certainty that on another trial it would change the result.

The defendants did not present a case bringing them within the rule stated, and -no error was committed by the court, below in denying their motion.

The order appealed from must be affirmed, with-costs.

Present: Freedman, Mo Adam and Gildersleeve, JJ.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 Misc. 26, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-benjamin-nysuperctnyc-1895.