White v. Bay Dredging & Construction Co.
216 So. 2d 436
Opinion
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date September 13, 1968.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
White v. Bay Dredging & Construction Co., 216 So. 2d 436 (Fla. 1968).
216 So. 2d 436 (White v. Bay Dredging & Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bergh v. Canadian Universal Insurance Company
216 So. 2d 436 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1968)