White v. Bay Dredging & Construction Co.

216 So. 2d 436
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 16, 1968
DocketNo. 37912
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 216 So. 2d 436 (White v. Bay Dredging & Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
White v. Bay Dredging & Construction Co., 216 So. 2d 436 (Fla. 1968).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date September 13, 1968.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

CALDWELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bergh v. Canadian Universal Insurance Company
216 So. 2d 436 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
216 So. 2d 436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-bay-dredging-construction-co-fla-1968.