White v. Barry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

White v. Barry

262 A.D. 732, 28 N.Y.S.2d 93

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 29, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 262 A.D. 732 (White v. Barry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White v. Barry, 262 A.D. 732, 28 N.Y.S.2d 93 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The first complete defense set up in defendant’s amended answer pleads justification of the publication which is the basis of plaintiff’s action. Papers incorporated by reference and made part of plaintiff’s reply set forth facts whereby the material allegations of that defense of justification are substantially admitted. No facts are alleged which defeat the admissions. Accordingly, judgment in favor of defendant is warranted by the pleadings. (Cafferty v. Southern Tier Publishing Co., 226 N. Y. 87, 93.)

The order, so far as appealed from, should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion for judgment on the pleadings in favor of defendant granted.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The first complete defense set up in defendant’s amended answer pleads justification of the publication which is the basis of plaintiff’s action. Papers incorporated by reference and made part of plaintiff’s reply set forth facts whereby the material allegations of that defense of justification are substantially admitted. No facts are alleged which defeat the admissions. Accordingly, judgment in favor of defendant is warranted by the pleadings. (Cafferty v. Southern Tier Publishing Co., 226 N. Y. 87, 93.)

The order, so far as appealed from, should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion for judgment on the pleadings in favor of defendant granted.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D. 732, 28 N.Y.S.2d 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-barry-nyappdiv-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack