White v. Atlantic Refining Co.
179 A. 434, 318 Pa. 569, 1935 Pa. LEXIS 621
Opinion
We are satisfied upon an inspection of the premises that since Judge Knight made his decree December 8, 1933, there is merit in the contention that there has been an encroachment of business within the 600-foot radius found to be exclusively residential. We accordingly direct the record to be returned to the court below and the proceedings remanded for a rehearing in the light of the changes of conditions which have taken place since the hearing of the cause before the chancellor.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
White v. Atlantic Refining Co., 179 A. 434, 318 Pa. 569, 1935 Pa. LEXIS 621 (Pa. 1935).
179 A. 434 (White v. Atlantic Refining Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lily Penn Food Stores, Inc. v. Commonwealth
472 A.2d 715 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1984)
Essick v. Shillam
32 A.2d 416 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1943)
Padlock Ranch, Inc. v. Washakie Needles Irr. Dist.
76 P.2d 617 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1938)
White v. Old York Road Country Club
185 A. 316 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)