White v. Atlantic Refining Co.

179 A. 434, 318 Pa. 569, 1935 Pa. LEXIS 621
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 21, 1935
DocketAppeal, 72
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 179 A. 434 (White v. Atlantic Refining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
White v. Atlantic Refining Co., 179 A. 434, 318 Pa. 569, 1935 Pa. LEXIS 621 (Pa. 1935).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We are satisfied upon an inspection of the premises that since Judge Knight made his decree December 8, 1933, there is merit in the contention that there has been an encroachment of business within the 600-foot radius found to be exclusively residential. We accordingly direct the record to be returned to the court below and the proceedings remanded for a rehearing in the light of the changes of conditions which have taken place since the hearing of the cause before the chancellor.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lily Penn Food Stores, Inc. v. Commonwealth
472 A.2d 715 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1984)
Essick v. Shillam
32 A.2d 416 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1943)
Padlock Ranch, Inc. v. Washakie Needles Irr. Dist.
76 P.2d 617 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1938)
White v. Old York Road Country Club
185 A. 316 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
179 A. 434, 318 Pa. 569, 1935 Pa. LEXIS 621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-atlantic-refining-co-pa-1935.