White v. 5 Arch Income Fund 2, LLC
This text of White v. 5 Arch Income Fund 2, LLC (White v. 5 Arch Income Fund 2, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 6 JEAN WHITE, Case No. 2:22-cv-00199-RFB-NJK 7 Plaintiff, Order 8] v. [Docket No. 37] 9] 5 ARCH INCOME FUND 2, LLC, et al., 10 Defendants. 1] Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to stay discovery pending resolution of 12] their motion to dismiss. Docket No. 37.! Plaintiff filed a response in opposition. Docket No. □□□□ 13] Defendants filed a reply. Docket No. 44. In light of the governing standards, see Kor Media 141 Group, LLC v. Green, 294 F.R.D. 579, 581 (D. Nev. 2013), the Court finds sufficient justification 15] to stay discovery. Accordingly, the motion to stay discovery is GRANTED. 16 In the event that resolution of the underlying motion to dismiss does not result in the 17] termination of this action, the parties must file a proposed discovery plan or joint status report 18} within 14 days of the issuance of such order. 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 Dated: March 3, 2023. ie.
é
24 2 ' The motion to dismiss has been fully briefed. Docket No. 35 (motion); Docket No. 38 26|| (response); Docket No. 40 (reply). 27 ? The Court liberally construes the filings of pro se litigants. Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007). 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
White v. 5 Arch Income Fund 2, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-5-arch-income-fund-2-llc-nvd-2023.