White v. 5 Arch Income Fund 2, LLC

D. Nevada

White v. 5 Arch Income Fund 2, LLC

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided March 3, 2023·No. 2:22-cv-00199·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 5 6 JEAN WHITE, Case No. 2:22-cv-00199-RFB-NJK 7 Plaintiff, Order 8] v. [Docket No. 37] 9] 5 ARCH INCOME FUND 2, LLC, et al., 10 Defendants. 1] Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to stay discovery pending resolution of 12] their motion to dismiss. Docket No. 37.! Plaintiff filed a response in opposition. Docket No. □□□□ 13] Defendants filed a reply. Docket No. 44. In light of the governing standards, see Kor Media 141 Group, LLC v. Green, 294 F.R.D. 579, 581 (D. Nev. 2013), the Court finds sufficient justification 15] to stay discovery. Accordingly, the motion to stay discovery is GRANTED. 16 In the event that resolution of the underlying motion to dismiss does not result in the 17] termination of this action, the parties must file a proposed discovery plan or joint status report 18} within 14 days of the issuance of such order. 20 Dated: March 3, 2023. ie.

é

24 2 ' The motion to dismiss has been fully briefed. Docket No. 35 (motion); Docket No. 38 26 (response); Docket No. 40 (reply). 27 ? The Court liberally construes the filings of pro se litigants. Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007). 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 5 6 JEAN WHITE, Case No. 2:22-cv-00199-RFB-NJK 7 Plaintiff, Order 8] v. [Docket No. 37] 9] 5 ARCH INCOME FUND 2, LLC, et al., 10 Defendants. 1] Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to stay discovery pending resolution of 12] their motion to dismiss. Docket No. 37.! Plaintiff filed a response in opposition. Docket No. □□□□ 13] Defendants filed a reply. Docket No. 44. In light of the governing standards, see Kor Media 141 Group, LLC v. Green, 294 F.R.D. 579, 581 (D. Nev. 2013), the Court finds sufficient justification 15] to stay discovery. Accordingly, the motion to stay discovery is GRANTED. 16 In the event that resolution of the underlying motion to dismiss does not result in the 17] termination of this action, the parties must file a proposed discovery plan or joint status report 18} within 14 days of the issuance of such order. 20 Dated: March 3, 2023. ie.

é

24 2 ' The motion to dismiss has been fully briefed. Docket No. 35 (motion); Docket No. 38 26 (response); Docket No. 40 (reply). 27 ? The Court liberally construes the filings of pro se litigants. Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007). 28

White v. 5 Arch Income Fund 2, LLC, (D. Nev. 2023).

Pincite

White v. 5 Arch Income Fund 2, LLC (White v. 5 Arch Income Fund 2, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related