White Star Trucking Co. v. Lomelo

Sixth Circuit

White Star Trucking Co. v. Lomelo

167 F.2d 880, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 2516

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedApril 21, 1948

DocketNo. 10609

StatusPublished

This text of 167 F.2d 880 (White Star Trucking Co. v. Lomelo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White Star Trucking Co. v. Lomelo, 167 F.2d 880, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 2516 (6th Cir. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel.

And it appearing that under Ohio law the husband may maintain an action for loss of services of his wife where the injury complained of is due to negligence. Curry v. Board of Commissioners of Franklin County, 135 Ohio St. 435, 436, 21 N.E. 2d 341; Cf. Smith v. Nicholas Bldg. Co., 93 Ohio St. 101, 103, 104, 112 N.E. 204, L.R.A.1916E, 700, Ann.Cas.l918D, 206.

And it appearing that the finding of the District Court that the wife was an invalid for some time and that the husband was deprived of her services is supported by substantial evidence, and that the amount of the judgment is not excessive:

It is ordered that the judgment be, and it hereby is, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI