White Star Towing Co. v. Reed

63 F. 1023, 12 C.C.A. 4, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2468
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedSeptember 12, 1894
DocketNo. 153
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 63 F. 1023 (White Star Towing Co. v. Reed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
White Star Towing Co. v. Reed, 63 F. 1023, 12 C.C.A. 4, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2468 (2d Cir. 1894).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The questions presented are entirely questions of fact, and the evidence is extremely conflicting. Upon examination of the record we see no reason to reverse the finding of the district judge that the collision would not have happened had either the tug or the steamship taken “more timely and efficient measures to avoid each other.” Decree of district court affirmed, with interest, and half costs to the Johnson against each steam vessel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit
258 F.2d 757 (Second Circuit, 1958)
Nos. 8-11
258 F.2d 757 (Second Circuit, 1958)
Tankers v. Steamtug Long Branch
258 F.2d 757 (Second Circuit, 1958)
The Winfield S. Cahill
258 F. 318 (Second Circuit, 1919)
The Strathleven
213 F. 979 (Fourth Circuit, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 F. 1023, 12 C.C.A. 4, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-star-towing-co-v-reed-ca2-1894.