White Star Towing Co. v. Reed
63 F. 1023, 12 C.C.A. 4, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2468
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided September 12, 1894·No. No. 153·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
The questions presented are entirely questions of fact, and the evidence is extremely conflicting. Upon examination of the record we see no reason to reverse the finding of the district judge that the collision would not have happened had either the tug or the steamship taken “more timely and efficient measures to avoid each other.” Decree of district court affirmed, with interest, and half costs to the Johnson against each steam vessel.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
White Star Towing Co. v. Reed, 63 F. 1023, 12 C.C.A. 4, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2468 (2d Cir. 1894).
63 F. 1023 (White Star Towing Co. v. Reed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit
258 F.2d 757 (Second Circuit, 1958)
Nos. 8-11
258 F.2d 757 (Second Circuit, 1958)
Tankers v. Steamtug Long Branch
258 F.2d 757 (Second Circuit, 1958)
The Winfield S. Cahill
258 F. 318 (Second Circuit, 1919)
The Strathleven
213 F. 979 (Fourth Circuit, 1914)