White, Ronnie Jr.

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 17, 2021
DocketWR-91,705-01
StatusPublished

This text of White, Ronnie Jr. (White, Ronnie Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
White, Ronnie Jr., (Tex. 2021).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-91,705-01

EX PARTE RONNIE WHITE JR., Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 17-11-12,792-A IN THE 24TH DISTRICT COURT FROM DEWITT COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Applicant was convicted of possession of methamphetamine and sentenced to fifteen years’

imprisonment. The thirteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. White v. State, No. 13-18-

00292-CR (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi del. Jul. 18, 2019); see also Ex parte Nailor, 149 S.W.3d 125

(Tex. Crim. App. 2004). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county

of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art.

11.07.

Applicant argues that trial counsel was ineffective regarding: (1) Applicant’s desire to accept

a pretrial plea offer; and (2) extraneous offense testimony that was admitted against him at trial,

which testimony Applicant alleges was false. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle 2

him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Weinstein, 421 S.W.3d 656

(Tex. Crim. App. 2014) . There is no response from counsel in the habeas record or findings from

the trial court. Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum

for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims. In developing the

record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to

hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants

to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing.

See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall

immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing Applicant’s

claims of ineffective assistance and false testimony. The trial court may also make any other

findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: March 17, 2021

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Ex Parte Nailor
149 S.W.3d 125 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2004)
Ex parte Weinstein
421 S.W.3d 656 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
White, Ronnie Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-ronnie-jr-texcrimapp-2021.