White Plains Industrial Realty Co. v. Milton Boat Yards, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

White Plains Industrial Realty Co. v. Milton Boat Yards, Inc.

253 A.D. 747, 1 N.Y.S.2d 512, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5443

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 17, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 253 A.D. 747 (White Plains Industrial Realty Co. v. Milton Boat Yards, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White Plains Industrial Realty Co. v. Milton Boat Yards, Inc., 253 A.D. 747, 1 N.Y.S.2d 512, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5443 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying the motion of the judgment creditor (1) to remove the receiver appointed in this foreclosure action in so far as it affects the business of the defendant; (2) to direct the receiver to deliver to the receiver in supplementary proceedings all the funds in his possession which have resulted from the running or liquidation of the defendant’s business, or (3) to direct the receiver to turn over to the receiver in supplementary proceedings assets sufficient to satisfy the appellant’s judgment, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying the motion of the judgment creditor (1) to remove the receiver appointed in this foreclosure action in so far as it affects the business of the defendant; (2) to direct the receiver to deliver to the receiver in supplementary proceedings all the funds in his possession which have resulted from the running or liquidation of the defendant’s business, or (3) to direct the receiver to turn over to the receiver in supplementary proceedings assets sufficient to satisfy the appellant’s judgment, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 A.D. 747, 1 N.Y.S.2d 512, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-plains-industrial-realty-co-v-milton-boat-yards-inc-nyappdiv-1937.