White Oaks Excavators, Inc. v. Board of Tax Review

Supreme Court of Connecticut

White Oaks Excavators, Inc. v. Board of Tax Review

337 A.2d 541, 168 Conn. 663

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided May 6, 1975·Published

Opinion

It appearing that the defendant has failed to defend with proper diligence against the plaintiff’s appeal and that it has failed to prosecute with proper diligence its cross appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that unless the defendant files its brief in the plaintiff’s appeal on or before June 4, 1975, the judgment be set aside and the case be remanded with direction to render judgment for the plaintiff; and, further, it is ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that unless the defendant files its brief in its cross appeal on or before June 4, 1975, the cross appeal be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It appearing that the defendant has failed to defend with proper diligence against the plaintiff’s appeal and that it has failed to prosecute with proper diligence its cross appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that unless the defendant files its brief in the plaintiff’s appeal on or before June 4, 1975, the judgment be set aside and the case be remanded with direction to render judgment for the plaintiff; and, further, it is ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that unless the defendant files its brief in its cross appeal on or before June 4, 1975, the cross appeal be dismissed.

White Oaks Excavators, Inc. v. Board of Tax Review, 337 A.2d 541, 168 Conn. 663 (Colo. 1975).

Pincite

337 A.2d 541 (White Oaks Excavators, Inc. v. Board of Tax Review) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.