White Oak, Inc. v. Katz & Simone

Louisiana Court of Appeal

White Oak, Inc. v. Katz & Simone

515 So. 2d 476, 1987 La. App. LEXIS 10425

DecidedOctober 14, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 515 So. 2d 476 (White Oak, Inc. v. Katz & Simone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White Oak, Inc. v. Katz & Simone, 515 So. 2d 476, 1987 La. App. LEXIS 10425 (La. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

GROVER L. COVINGTON, Chief Judge.

Appellee has filed this motion to dismiss, arguing the appeal is from an interlocutory judgment which is non-appealable absent a showing of irreparable injury.

White Oak, Inc. has filed suit against Katz and Simone (a professional law corporation), Stephen J. Simone, and First National Bank of Jefferson Parish. Defendants ¹ filed an exception raising the objection of improper venue. After a hearing the trial court rendered judgment in favor of plaintiff denying the exception. Defendants then filed a motion and order for appeal contending they would suffer irreparable harm unless allowed to appeal. Plaintiff has filed this motion to dismiss.

Code of Civil Procedure art. 2083 provides that an appeal may be taken from an interlocutory judgment which may cause irreparable injury. The standard for [477]*477determining whether an interlocutory judgment may cause irreparable injury is whether any error in the judgment may be corrected as a practical matter in an appeal following a determination of the merits. Cheramie v. Vegas, 385 So.2d 453 (La.App. 1st Cir.1980). A judgment denying an objection of improper venue is one that causes irreparable injury since the appellate court has no practical means of correcting the error on appeal after a trial on the merits. Herlitz Construction Company, Inc. v. Hotel Investors of New Iberia, Inc., 396 So.2d 878, footnote 1 (La.1981); Greater Lafourche Port Commission v. Louisiana State Civil Service Commission, 481 So.2d 745 (La.App. 1st Cir.1985).

For the above reasons, the motion to dismiss is denied at mover’s cost.

DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GROVER L. COVINGTON, Chief Judge.

Appellee has filed this motion to dismiss, arguing the appeal is from an interlocutory judgment which is non-appealable absent a showing of irreparable injury.

White Oak, Inc. has filed suit against Katz and Simone (a professional law corporation), Stephen J. Simone, and First National Bank of Jefferson Parish. Defendants ¹ filed an exception raising the objection of improper venue. After a hearing the trial court rendered judgment in favor of plaintiff denying the exception. Defendants then filed a motion and order for appeal contending they would suffer irreparable harm unless allowed to appeal. Plaintiff has filed this motion to dismiss.

Code of Civil Procedure art. 2083 provides that an appeal may be taken from an interlocutory judgment which may cause irreparable injury. The standard for [477]*477determining whether an interlocutory judgment may cause irreparable injury is whether any error in the judgment may be corrected as a practical matter in an appeal following a determination of the merits. Cheramie v. Vegas, 385 So.2d 453 (La.App. 1st Cir.1980). A judgment denying an objection of improper venue is one that causes irreparable injury since the appellate court has no practical means of correcting the error on appeal after a trial on the merits. Herlitz Construction Company, Inc. v. Hotel Investors of New Iberia, Inc., 396 So.2d 878, footnote 1 (La.1981); Greater Lafourche Port Commission v. Louisiana State Civil Service Commission, 481 So.2d 745 (La.App. 1st Cir.1985).

For the above reasons, the motion to dismiss is denied at mover’s cost.

DENIED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

515 So. 2d 476, 1987 La. App. LEXIS 10425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-oak-inc-v-katz-simone-lactapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack