White Nile Software, Inc. v. Carrington, Coleman, Sloman & Blumenthal, LLP

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 4, 2021·No. 05-19-00780-CV·Published

Opinion

FILE COPY

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS -- -- -- --

NO. 20-0993 § § Dallas County, CARRINGTON, COLEMAN, § SLOMAN & BLUMENTHAL, LLP § 5th District. v. § WHITE NILE SOFTWARE, INC. §

January 29, 2021

Petitioner's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case, having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.



I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of said Court under the date shown. It is further ordered that petitioner, CARRINGTON, COLEMAN, SLOMAN & BLUMENTHAL, LLP, pay all costs incurred on this petition. WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this the 4th day of March, 2021.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White Nile Software, Inc. v. Carrington, Coleman, Sloman & Blumenthal, LLP, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

White Nile Software, Inc. v. Carrington, Coleman, Sloman & Blumenthal, LLP (White Nile Software, Inc. v. Carrington, Coleman, Sloman & Blumenthal, LLP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.