White, Kline & Co. v. Burnett
38 S.E. 332, 113 Ga. 151, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 190
Opinion
1. Where a petition for certiorari alleged that a justice’s court erred in making a specified decision, and the magistrate’s answer, which upon a traverse thereto was sustained, distinctly averred that no such decision was made, the assignment of error fell to the ground.
2. A justice’s court lias no power, because of error in the rendition of a judgment, to set it aside and grant a new trial; and even if it had, the motion for a new trial in the present case was too vague and uncertain to be regarded as meritorious. Judgment, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
White, Kline & Co. v. Burnett, 38 S.E. 332, 113 Ga. 151, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 190 (Ga. 1901).
38 S.E. 332 (White, Kline & Co. v. Burnett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Barnes v. Mechanics Savings Bank
95 S.E. 757 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Nashville, Chattanooga & Saint Louis Railway v. Brown
60 S.E. 319 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)
Field v. Jordan
52 S.E. 885 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)