White, Kline & Co. v. Burnett

38 S.E. 332, 113 Ga. 151, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 190
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 28, 1901·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Lewis, J.

1. Where a petition for certiorari alleged that a justice’s court erred in making a specified decision, and the magistrate’s answer, which upon a traverse thereto was sustained, distinctly averred that no such decision was made, the assignment of error fell to the ground.

Submitted March 2, Decided March 28, 1901. Motion for rehearing denied April 10, 1901. Certiorari. Before Judge Lumpkin! Fulton superior court. June 25, 1900. George W. Brooks and Shepard Bryan, for plaintiffs.

2. A justice’s court lias no power, because of error in the rendition of a judgment, to set it aside and grant a new trial; and even if it had, the motion for a new trial in the present case was too vague and uncertain to be regarded as meritorious. Judgment, affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White, Kline & Co. v. Burnett, 38 S.E. 332, 113 Ga. 151, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 190 (Ga. 1901).

38 S.E. 332 (White, Kline & Co. v. Burnett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barnes v. Mechanics Savings Bank
95 S.E. 757 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Nashville, Chattanooga & Saint Louis Railway v. Brown
60 S.E. 319 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)
Field v. Jordan
52 S.E. 885 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)