White, Jason Earl

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 30, 2019
DocketWR-88,720-01
StatusPublished

This text of White, Jason Earl (White, Jason Earl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
White, Jason Earl, (Tex. 2019).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-88,720-01 & WR-88,720-02

EX PARTE JASON EARL WHITE, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. W10077-1 & W8888-1 IN THE 335TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HOOD COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). In Cause No. CR10077, Applicant was

convicted of three counts of aggravated sexual assault, one count of indecency with a child by

contact, and three counts of indecency with a child by exposure and sentenced to sixty-five years’

imprisonment, twenty years’ imprisonment, and eight years’ imprisonment, respectively. In Cause

No. 8888, Applicant was convicted of aggravated sexual assault of a child and sentenced to forty

years’ imprisonment. Applicant’s convictions were affirmed by the Second Court of Appeals. White

v. State, Nos. 02-07-00089-CR & 02-07-00090-CR (Tex. App.—Fort Worth May 29, 2008) (not 2

designated for publication).

The Court remanded these writ applications for responses and findings addressing one of

Applicant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims and for a finding concerning the status of a

pending motion for judgment nunc pro tunc.

After an independent review of the entire record and the trial court’s findings, we find that

Applicant's ineffective assistance of counsel claim is without merit. Therefore, we deny relief.

Applicant’s claim for pre-sentence jail time credit is dismissed. Ex parte Florence, 319

S.W.3d 695 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010); Ex parte Ybarra, 149 S.W.3d 147 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004).

Filed: January 30, 2019 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Ybarra
149 S.W.3d 147 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2004)
Ex Parte Florence
319 S.W.3d 695 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2010)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
White, Jason Earl, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-jason-earl-texcrimapp-2019.