White (Edward) v. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided June 24, 2022·No. 84863·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

EDWARD WHITE, No. 84863 Petitioner, vs. FILE THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

ORDER DENYING PETITION

CL ERK

This is a pro se original petition for a writ of mandamus.

Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary intervention is warranted. See NRS 34.170; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004) (noting that petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted). Petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition").

Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

Parraguirre

J.

Hardesty

A&fbc,0 J-

Stiglich

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A a4W1D z-

cc: Edward White

Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

tO) 1947A

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White (Edward) v. State, (Neb. 2022).

White (Edward) v. State (White (Edward) v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related