White (Edward) v. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
EDWARD WHITE, No. 84863 Petitioner, vs. FILE THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
ORDER DENYING PETITION
CL ERK
This is a pro se original petition for a writ of mandamus.
Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary intervention is warranted. See NRS 34.170; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004) (noting that petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted). Petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition").
Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
Parraguirre
J.
Hardesty
A&fbc,0 J-
Stiglich
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A a4W1D z-
cc: Edward White
Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
tO) 1947A
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
White (Edward) v. State (White (Edward) v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.