White Deer Township v. Napp

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

White Deer Township v. Napp

947 A.2d 709

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in White Deer Township v. Napp. Read the opinion of the Court — 603 Pa. 562 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 22, 2008·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 22nd day of April, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioners, are:

(1) Whether a Second Class Township can provide post-retirement medical insurance, supplementing Medicare, to Township Supervisors who are also employees, who have been employed by the Township for a minimum of twenty years?

(2) Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in finding that the Township’s complaint was not time-barred?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 22nd day of April, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioners, are:

(1) Whether a Second Class Township can provide post-retirement medical insurance, supplementing Medicare, to Township Supervisors who are also employees, who have been employed by the Township for a minimum of twenty years?

(2) Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in finding that the Township’s complaint was not time-barred?

White Deer Township v. Napp, 947 A.2d 709 (Pa. 2008).

Pincite

947 A.2d 709 (White Deer Township v. Napp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.