White Castle System, Inc. v. Bowers

172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 141
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 19, 1961·No. No. 36783·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The Board of Tax Appeals, as an administrative appellate board, has, in its decision, applied to the factual situation in this cause certain rules laid down by this court in construing the above-quoted section and has arrived at the conclusion above stated. It is not the function of this court to substitute its judgment for that of the Board of Tax Appeals on such factual issues but only to determine from an examination of the record whether the decision reached by the board is unreasonable or unlawful.

From an examination of the entire record, this court is unable to find that the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is unreasonable or unlawful. The decision is, therefore, affirmed.

Decision affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Taft, Matthias and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Herbert, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White Castle System, Inc. v. Bowers, 172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 141 (Ohio 1961).

172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 141 (White Castle System, Inc. v. Bowers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.