White Bay Enterprises, Ltd. v. Newsday, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

White Bay Enterprises, Ltd. v. Newsday, Inc.

288 A.D.2d 211, 732 N.Y.S.2d 865, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10426

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 5, 2001·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff White Bay Enterprises, Ltd., appeals, as limited by its notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Satterfield, J.), dated October 11, 2000, as granted the motion of the defendant, Newsday, Inc., and the separate motion of the nonparties, Fresh Forest, Ltd., and J&F Four Star, Inc., to quash two subpoenas duces tecum served upon the nonparties.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

[212]*212The Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in granting the motions to quash the subpoenas duces tecum served on the nonparties, as the discovery sought is not material and necessary to the prosecution of the action (see, Palma v Iona Coll., 259 AD2d 532; Feeley v Midas Props., 168 AD2d 416). Further, the subpoenas are overly broad and unduly burdensome. Santucci, J. P., Altman, Florio, H. Miller and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff White Bay Enterprises, Ltd., appeals, as limited by its notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Satterfield, J.), dated October 11, 2000, as granted the motion of the defendant, Newsday, Inc., and the separate motion of the nonparties, Fresh Forest, Ltd., and J&F Four Star, Inc., to quash two subpoenas duces tecum served upon the nonparties.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

[212]*212The Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in granting the motions to quash the subpoenas duces tecum served on the nonparties, as the discovery sought is not material and necessary to the prosecution of the action (see, Palma v Iona Coll., 259 AD2d 532; Feeley v Midas Props., 168 AD2d 416). Further, the subpoenas are overly broad and unduly burdensome. Santucci, J. P., Altman, Florio, H. Miller and Cozier, JJ., concur.

White Bay Enterprises, Ltd. v. Newsday, Inc., 288 A.D.2d 211, 732 N.Y.S.2d 865, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10426 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

288 A.D.2d 211 (White Bay Enterprises, Ltd. v. Newsday, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related