White-Battle v. Democratic Party
158 F. App'x 447
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in White-Battle v. Democratic Party. Read the opinion of the Court — 134 F. App'x 641 →
Opinion
Sherry White-Battle appeals the district court’s order denying her second motion to amend her complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See White-Battle v. Democratic Party of Virginia, 323 F.Supp.2d 696 (E.D.Va.2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately [448]*448presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
White-Battle v. Democratic Party, 158 F. App'x 447 (4th Cir. 2005).
158 F. App'x 447 (White-Battle v. Democratic Party) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
White-Battle v. Democratic Party of Virginia
323 F. Supp. 2d 696 (E.D. Virginia, 2004)