Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Whitcraft v. State

Whitcraft v. State

528 So. 2d 998, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1816, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3477, 1988 WL 79322
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 2, 1988
DocketNo. 87-232
StatusPublished

This text of 528 So. 2d 998 (Whitcraft v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whitcraft v. State, 528 So. 2d 998, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1816, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3477, 1988 WL 79322 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Roy George Whitcraft, III, challenges his conviction and sentence for second-degree murder. He maintains that 1) the trial court erred in failing to reduce the first-degree murder charge to manslaughter and 2) the trial court erred in failing to define the term “criminal agency” when requested to do so by the jury. We find no merit in Whitcraft’s contentions and affirm. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410, 3.420; see Spence v. State, 515 So.2d 312 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Larsen v. State, 485 So.2d 1372 (Fla. 1st DCA), aff'd, 492 So.2d 1333 (Fla.1986); Parker v. State, 336 So.2d 426 (Fla. 1st DCA), appeal and cert. dismissed, 341 So.2d 292 (Fla.1976).

Affirmed.

NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Larsen v. State
485 So. 2d 1372 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Parker v. State
336 So. 2d 426 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Spence v. State
515 So. 2d 312 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
528 So. 2d 998, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1816, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3477, 1988 WL 79322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitcraft-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.