Whitcomb v. Sutherland

Illinois Supreme Court

Whitcomb v. Sutherland

20 Ill. 549

DecidedApril 15, 1858

StatusPublished

This text of 20 Ill. 549 (Whitcomb v. Sutherland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whitcomb v. Sutherland, 20 Ill. 549 (Ill. 1858).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam.

Since the re-argument we have attentively considered this cause, and are of opinion that the former judgment herein was correct, and therefore now enter the same judgment, and we do not think it necessary to add anything to the opinion of the court given on the former hearing.

The decree is affirmed.

This case is reported in 18 Ill. R. 578. Upon a re-hearing of the case the foregoing opinion was pronounced. The same counsel who, argued the cause in the first instance, were heard at the re-argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

Since the re-argument we have attentively considered this cause, and are of opinion that the former judgment herein was correct, and therefore now enter the same judgment, and we do not think it necessary to add anything to the opinion of the court given on the former hearing.

The decree is affirmed.

This case is reported in 18 Ill. R. 578. Upon a re-hearing of the case the foregoing opinion was pronounced. The same counsel who, argued the cause in the first instance, were heard at the re-argument.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 Ill. 549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitcomb-v-sutherland-ill-1858.