Whitcomb v. Dickie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Whitcomb v. Dickie

27 A.D.2d 689, 276 N.Y.S.2d 658, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5037

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 12, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 27 A.D.2d 689 (Whitcomb v. Dickie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whitcomb v. Dickie, 27 A.D.2d 689, 276 N.Y.S.2d 658, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5037 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: We affirm, not only because the 1952 conveyance was not in violation of the Debtor and Creditor Law since the grantor was not insolvent then nor rendered insolvent thereby as held by the court below, but also for the additional reason that the action to set aside that conveyance was barred by the Statute of Limitations. Furthermore, fair consideration was given for the 1952 conveyance as well as for [690]*690the 1960 conveyance. (Appeal from judgment of Erie Trial Term dismissing the complaint on the merits.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry, Del Vecchio and Marsh, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: We affirm, not only because the 1952 conveyance was not in violation of the Debtor and Creditor Law since the grantor was not insolvent then nor rendered insolvent thereby as held by the court below, but also for the additional reason that the action to set aside that conveyance was barred by the Statute of Limitations. Furthermore, fair consideration was given for the 1952 conveyance as well as for [690]*690the 1960 conveyance. (Appeal from judgment of Erie Trial Term dismissing the complaint on the merits.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry, Del Vecchio and Marsh, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A.D.2d 689, 276 N.Y.S.2d 658, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5037, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitcomb-v-dickie-nyappdiv-1967.