Whitby v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
This text of 120 F. App'x 652 (Whitby v. United Parcel Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Latwon Whitby appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his Title VII action. Whitby sued United Parcel Service, Inc., for constructive discharge based on his African American race.
Having carefully reviewed the record and considered the arguments Whitby raises on appeal, we agree with the district court that the evidence of the working conditions upon which Whitby based his lawsuit does not support a race-based constructive-discharge claim. See Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir. 2002) (summary judgment standard of review); Breeding v. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., 164 F.3d 1151, 1159 (8th Cir.1999) (discussing constructive discharge). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable George Howard, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
120 F. App'x 652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitby-v-united-parcel-service-inc-ca8-2005.