Whitby v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Whitby v. State

493 S.W.3d 52, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 675, 2016 WL 3611556

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 5, 2016·No. ED 103193·Published

Opinion

[53] ORDER

PER CURIAM

Brandon Whitby appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[53] ORDER

PER CURIAM

Brandon Whitby appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Whitby v. State, 493 S.W.3d 52, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 675, 2016 WL 3611556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

493 S.W.3d 52 (Whitby v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.