Whitby v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Whitby v. State

493 S.W.3d 52, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 675, 2016 WL 3611556

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 5, 2016

DocketED 103193

StatusPublished

This text of 493 S.W.3d 52 (Whitby v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whitby v. State, 493 S.W.3d 52, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 675, 2016 WL 3611556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

[53]*53 ORDER

PER CURIAM

Brandon Whitby appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[53]*53 ORDER

PER CURIAM

Brandon Whitby appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

493 S.W.3d 52, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 675, 2016 WL 3611556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitby-v-state-moctapp-2016.