Whitaker v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Whitaker v. State

314 S.W.3d 439, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 947, 2010 WL 2730550

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 13, 2010

DocketWD 70523

StatusPublished

This text of 314 S.W.3d 439 (Whitaker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whitaker v. State, 314 S.W.3d 439, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 947, 2010 WL 2730550 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Arthur Whitaker appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 24.035. Following a guilty plea, Whitaker was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment for driving while intoxicated pursuant to §§ 577.010 and 577.023, RSMo. Whitaker claims that he was improperly sentenced as an aggravated offender because the State failed to prove that he had three prior convictions for intoxication-related traffic offenses. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Arthur Whitaker appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 24.035. Following a guilty plea, Whitaker was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment for driving while intoxicated pursuant to §§ 577.010 and 577.023, RSMo. Whitaker claims that he was improperly sentenced as an aggravated offender because the State failed to prove that he had three prior convictions for intoxication-related traffic offenses. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

314 S.W.3d 439, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 947, 2010 WL 2730550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitaker-v-state-moctapp-2010.