Whitaker v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Whitaker v. State

231 S.W.3d 850, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1201, 2007 WL 2471066

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 4, 2007·No. No. WD 67375·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Jessie Whitaker, Jr., appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Whitaker claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to improper comments made by the State during closing arguments. We find that the trial court did not clearly err in denying Whitaker’s Rule 29.15 motion. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM.

Jessie Whitaker, Jr., appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Whitaker claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to improper comments made by the State during closing arguments. We find that the trial court did not clearly err in denying Whitaker’s Rule 29.15 motion. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Whitaker v. State, 231 S.W.3d 850, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1201, 2007 WL 2471066 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

231 S.W.3d 850 (Whitaker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.