Whitaker v. State

639 So. 2d 1135, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7511, 1994 WL 391036
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 29, 1994
DocketNo. 93-2737
StatusPublished

This text of 639 So. 2d 1135 (Whitaker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whitaker v. State, 639 So. 2d 1135, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7511, 1994 WL 391036 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

PETERSON, Judge.

Our review of the record in this Anders appeal reveals a sentencing error. The trial court originally imposed a period of probation on January 31, 1991 for a third-degree felony offense with a statutory five year maximum penalty. The original probation was revoked and a new period imposed that would expire on October 14, 1996, over eight months beyond the five year statutory maximum.

We are bound by previous decisions of this court to vacate that portion of the new period of probation that extends beyond January 31, 1996. See, e.g., Conrey v. State, 624 So.2d 793 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Ogden v. State, 605 So.2d 155 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

SENTENCE PARTIALLY VACATED.

THOMPSON, J., concurs. W. SHARP, J., dissents without opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Conrey v. State
624 So. 2d 793 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Ogden v. State
605 So. 2d 155 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
639 So. 2d 1135, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7511, 1994 WL 391036, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitaker-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.