Whitaker v. State

552 So. 2d 306, 1989 WL 136812
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 16, 1989
Docket88-1913
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 552 So. 2d 306 (Whitaker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whitaker v. State, 552 So. 2d 306, 1989 WL 136812 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

552 So.2d 306 (1989)

Terramikia T. WHITAKER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 88-1913.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

November 16, 1989.

*307 Thomas C. Greene of Greene, Colegrove, deGroot Chartered, Sanford, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Pamela D. Cichon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

GOSHORN, Judge.

Terramikia Whitaker appeals the departure sentence imposed after jury convictions for second degree murder, aggravated battery, use of a firearm in the commission of a felony, carrying a concealed firearm, and discharging a firearm in public.

The trial court gave the following reason for the departure sentence:

This sentence is aggravated by reason of the defendant's total disregard for the safety of other persons and the unreasonable risk towards other persons present at the time of the offense which involved a firearm.

The statutory prohibition against discharging a firearm in public is founded upon a need to protect the public's safety. Therefore, risk of harm to third persons and disregard for the safety of others were already factored into the guidelines scoresheet by virtue of Whitaker's conviction for discharging a firearm in public. Because factors already considered in calculating a guidelines score cannot justify a departure sentence, Hendrix v. State, 475 So.2d 1218 (Fla. 1985), we affirm the convictions but reverse the departure sentence and remand for resentencing.

AFFIRMED and part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for resentencing.

COWART and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cleveland v. State
673 So. 2d 983 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Welch v. State
639 So. 2d 1068 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Brown v. State
587 So. 2d 563 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Strawn v. State
576 So. 2d 877 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
552 So. 2d 306, 1989 WL 136812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitaker-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.