Whitaker v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Whitaker v. State

796 S.W.2d 347, 303 Ark. 374, 1990 Ark. LEXIS 584

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedOctober 15, 1990

DocketRC 90-50

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 796 S.W.2d 347 (Whitaker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whitaker v. State, 796 S.W.2d 347, 303 Ark. 374, 1990 Ark. LEXIS 584 (Ark. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Johnny Whitaker, by his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

The motion admits that the record was not timely filed and that it was no fault of the appellant.

However, the motion does not state good cause for granting the motion as discussed in our per curiam issued February 5, 1979, 265 Ark. 964. If the attorney for Whitaker will concede that it was his fault that the record was not filed, or if other good cause is shown, then the motion will be granted. The present motion for rule on the clerk is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Johnny Whitaker, by his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

The motion admits that the record was not timely filed and that it was no fault of the appellant.

However, the motion does not state good cause for granting the motion as discussed in our per curiam issued February 5, 1979, 265 Ark. 964. If the attorney for Whitaker will concede that it was his fault that the record was not filed, or if other good cause is shown, then the motion will be granted. The present motion for rule on the clerk is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

796 S.W.2d 347, 303 Ark. 374, 1990 Ark. LEXIS 584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitaker-v-state-ark-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack